“Certitude belongs exclusively to those who only own one encyclopedia.”
~Robert Anton Wilson~
I had this argument at work where I pulled this quote out and someone accused me of a logical fallacy. Well I hate to differ but I was right. The underlying premise here is that if you only have one reference then as far as you know the data is absolutely correct. Now as you check more and more references discrepancy and errors creep in to make you doubt the validity of the information.
Actually it was an innocent bystander to the argument that took this quote and wished to argue semantics. They actually pulled out a dictionary and looked up certitude. This proved my point exactly for all I had to do was look at another dictionary to draw their definition into question. Actually I checked 3 and they were all different.
They then tried to contrive an argument on the example of a wikipedia article on someones home address. The assumptions were many and flawed but since it was hypothetical I can shoot it down easier. They assume they got the right person, They assume the person hadn’t moved since the posting and they assumed the person wasn’t lying. These additional points were enough to stop that line of reasoning.
Well I must give my argumentative friend credit because they actually tried to use Occam’s razor to state that we MUST operate under simpler beliefs. To this my argument is that they may have used the razor too liberally to ignore some statistical sample size and over simplified. We only accept a certain amount of information as absolutely valid out of simplicity but we are choosing to ignore the error in this. That doesn’t mean the error doesn’t exist.
I haven’t heard a rebuttal to this yet so maybe the argument is over.